Even Minnie Mouse Could Have Used a Change of Scenery
Every Now & Then! --- CLICK HERE to View Our New Page!
April 18, 2010 » The Revolution Starts Tomorrow ...
Stylings of David Dinkins are Dissected & Observed!
Remember the Crown Heights Affair of 1991 (not the musical group that had "THE HOT DANCE CLUB" chart No. 1 in 1975 for "Dreaming a Dream")? Wikipedia does : here's an excerpt »»»
"... The repercussions of the Crown Heights riot, based on the official indifference to the plight of Jews, contributed directly to the defeat of the incumbent mayor of New York," David Dinkins. He was embattled by many political adversaries in his re-election bid, including vocal proponents of “black nationalism, back-to-Africa, economic radicalism, and racial exclusiveness.”
On November 17, 1992, New York Governor Mario Cuomo gave the Director of Criminal Justice Services, Richard H.Girgenti, the authority to investigate the rioting and the Nelson trial. The Girgenti Report was compiled by over 40 lawyers and investigators, and consisted of a two volume, 600-page document of its findings on July 20, 1993. It was extremely critical of Police Commissioner Lee Brown. The report also embarrassed Dinkins on his handling of the riots.
According to the report, Dinkins hesitated to deploy vast numbers of police to stop the rioting because he had been elected as a peacemaker. However, this strategy proved disastrous. Many Jews criticized Dinkins for this. The first night of the riot, Dinkins, along with Police Commissioner Lee Brown, both African Americans, went to Crown Heights to dispel the false rumors about the circumstances surrounding the accident, but they had no impact on the rioters, most of whom were young black men.
In a 16-minute speech on the Thanksgiving holiday following the riot, Dinkins denied that he had prevented police from protecting citizens in Crown Heights. Many Jews believed Dinkins failed to contain the riot and failed to exercise his responsibility, to the detriment of the Jewish community.
The Crown Heights riot was an important issue raised repeatedly on the campaign trail. Rudolph Giuliani, who would become the next mayor of New York, called the Crown Heights riot a "pogrom" because "for three days people were beaten up, people were sent to the hospital because they were Jewish. There's no question that not enough was done about it by the city of New York" Giuliani won by over 44,000 votes. Support for Dinkins by Jews, Hispanics and Puerto Ricans, Asian-Americans, uniformed police officers, and first-time voters decreased significantly from the previous election ...
It is getting too late in the morning to animadvert non-critically and fully on the profound truth of Mr. Friedman's observations on our current Third World predicament but Alan Greenspan's recent comments on how we got into our present-day financial mess deserve more than passing mention. I'm sure most of you recall the time-period when Alan Greenspan was Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board from 1987-2006. I will never forget one particular occasion, one fine day, towards the end of his tenure at the private banking cartel that still calls itself the US Central Bank, old Alan hectored a group of Congressman, before whom he was testifying, practically snarling out his words, saying that to deny entry to even more Third Worlders into the United States would be a RACIST act!
These days doddering Alan is singing an entirely different tune! According to Thursday's edition of the Wall Street Journal, he is now of the opinion that the policy of food stamp mortgages for Illegals was damn-near physically forced upon his beloved Federal Reserve by crooked politicians : "I mean, I sat through meeting after meeting in which pressures on the Federal Reserve --- and on, I might add, all of the regulatory agencies --- to enhance lending were remarkable!"
What I find remarkable about old Alan is the disgusting fact that he was almost certainly giving himself a handjob, under the table, while he vomited up his latest pitcherful of lies!
It has ever been a brain-washing technique of the transnational media to constantly hail the copious gray matter of Barry Spendalicious. To listen to the transnationals always telling it and giving it the sell : it was a close race between devoting a lifetime of research of finding a cure for cancer or running for the office of US President before Barry plumped for the latter pursuit. His words are oracles and his ideas have wings! YAIR, RIGHT!!! Surely, there must some commentator with the courage to strip the Emperor of his new clothes & proclaim him naked. Come on, be honest --- we have all suspected, for the longest time, that Barry is but a bulb who burns dimly! That commentator? --- his name is Alan Bock! To admire his courage and the perspicacity of his observation : CLICK HERE.
called Kill Zone. What prompted him to write that book was his reaction upon visiting the sixth
floor at the Texas School Book Depository. This is how he describes it: “I turned
my attention to the window in the southeast corner—the infamous sniper’s
nest …. I immediately felt like I had been hit with a sledge hammer. The word
that came to mind at what I saw … was: IMPOSSIBLE.” (p. 5) He goes on to say
that he instantly realized that Oswald could not have performed the shooting
feat, because he knew that he himself could not, and he was a professional.
Later in the book, Roberts interviewed Sergeant Carlos Hathcock. Hathcock is a
former senior instructor at the Marines Corps Sniper Instruction School at
Quantico, Virginia. Some have referred to him as the most famous American
military sniper in history. As Griffith points out, Hathcock had 93 confirmed
kills in Vietnam. He toured the land conducting sniper schools for police SWAT
teams. Roberts asked Hathcock if he thought Oswald could have done what the
Warren Commission said he did. Hathcock said no. He then added that he had
reconstructed the scenario at Quantico: the angle, moving target, time limit, etc.
He told Roberts, “I don’t know how many times we tried it, but we couldn’t duplicate
what the Warren Commission said Oswald did.” (ibid., pp. 89–90) Again,
we are talking about professionals: men who completely outclass Oswald in raw
shooting ability. But further, these are professional assassins who practice their
skills almost daily ...
(CLICK HERE for more on Oswald's Activities as a Government Operative).
We are headed for a time when the brutal music must be faced & listened to. That point in time is fast approaching. To quote Yogi Berra : when we get to a fork in the road, we will take it. We have no other choice.
he would be arrested for Public Indecency!"
Wanted for Pleasuring Himself! »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
The theory behind making Michael Steele chairman of the RNC was if you put a Black guy at the head of a Republican organization, then the Party would then inoculate itself against media charges of inherent RACISM. But such theorizing does not usually work for the best. The fact that John McCain, 2008's designated loser, got only 3% of the Black vote should tell anybody, who is not a full-time resident of a mental institution, that Blacks do not vote Republican, let alone contribute money to groups that fund Republican candidates for electoral office!
Now on the heels of the latest scandal, Michael Steele refuses to resign --- and guess what, boys & girls?! --- yes, you are so right! --- he charges RACISM, as per usual! Yet again Einstein, you go to the head of the class! In matters of Affirmative Action, nothing succeeds like Crooked Incompetence! Today the RNC, tomorrow the WORLD!
The 911-farce worked so well that the federal Blue Suiters (AKA : Blue Suitors) had to bring it all back in a newly-bottled form in September, 2008. Days and times that we should never forget, Daddy Warbucks! At this juncture in time it was not merely buildings that were bombed in DC & NYC and 3,000 people who died, but a wretched popcorn stand of a monetary system that had been hastily constructed after the destruction of the Bretton Woods monetary system which had enjoyed a brief, prosperous span from 1944-1971. And because of this new sham, many more than 3,000 will die --- vraiment, whole nations will crumble & unimagined violence shall ensue! I'm talking about the "Financial Crisis of September, 2008," of course! What a sack of feces that was! It is starting to dawn, like the sun coming up like thunder or a fat woman's hind-end slowly rising from a terrycloth beach blanket, that the "Financial Crisis of September, 2008" was just a whooping, great swindle by which Wall Street managed to gain an immunity for past crimes and an indemnity towards the unprecedented take-over of public government! The very nasty hits keep on coming! More federal & state taxes, skinned from taxpayers' hide! More Bailouts! More Socialism! More Unemployment! More Third World immigration! More Jobs for the Red Chinese!
Some people & some places get it --- believe it or not! And those people have just published an Op-Ed in the New York Times of all places! CLICK HERE.
Number 2 : Oh certainly, but both sides are becoming identical. What in fact has been created is an international community — perfect blueprint for world order. When the sides facing each other suddenly realize that they're looking into a mirror, they will see that this is the pattern for the future.
Number 6 : The whole Earth as the Village?
Number 2 : That is my hope. What's yours?
Number 6 : I'd like to be the first man on the moon!
Naaah, --- Barry's too much of a true believer. Clinton didn't gave a damn one way or the other about the Third World invasion. All he cared about was the babes and the cash-stuffed envelopes that were simply the natural perks of being the Prez. It must be stated over & over : Barry is a true believer --- he wants this country to be absolutely swamped by the DREGS of the Third World!
The
Tories are desperate. There are only
five or six weeks to go before the general election. They have
lost their 10-point lead in the
polls and are now running even with the abysmal Labour Party. The
rumor is strong that David Cameron, the
Tory shadow Prime Minister, will propose that all non-EU immigration
into the
UK be subjected to a “hard cap” if the Conservatives are
afforded the opportunity to run the House of Commons. During
the 13 years of “new” Labour, immigration into the UK averaged out at
between
200,000 and 300,000 per annum --- of this number, approximately
two-thirds are Third
World immigrants --- the rest being from the EU (Polish carpenters,
working
like demons and behaving like robots, are a favorite Limey trope).
Gordon
Brown, wishing to keep his boot on the collective Tory neck, has
proposed a “points”
system for immigration. This would ape
the Australian system, which limits immigration into that country based
on "need rather than absolute numbers." But
the proverbial fly in the ointment with a
“points” system is its constant mutability at the hands of a
bureaucracy which
is left-wing in its design if not also in its prejudices.
In brief, “points” can be made to bend by
simply craving exceptions for them out of whole cloth; all to achieve a
result which is
desired --- and by now, gentle reader, you know perfectly well, that
when
lefties want something and when lefties are in charge, they will say
and do
anything to get what they want! (Australians have long come to rue the
day when
they changed over to a “points” system).
Rumor has it that the Tories will promise to push for a “hard cap” of 40,000 per annum for Third World entrants into the UK. Here's hoping that the rumor is both vicious and true!
PUSS : ( thinks to Self ) : I see Paris, I see France ...
US Party Politics Gone Wrong. --- She Thinks He's a Man. He Thinks He's a Horse.
(THEY'RE BOTH JACKASSES!) --- IS THERE A BRONZE HORSE BRIDLE IN THE HOUSE? --- ANYONE?
Time
out of mind, the Wall Street Journal has been an Open Borders kind of
newspaper. Jason L. Riley is on the
editorial board of the paper and can be relied upon to toe the
corporate
line. And he does so in his Op-Ed piece in
this morning's paper, entitled “Obamacare
& Immigration Reform.” But he does so with a difference, this time. It seems that the political climate is no
longer propitious for Open Borders and its evident consequences. He
thinks it a
great shame.
Yes,
indeed, he foists the same old Third World canards upon his readers :
that
hospitals are not going bankrupt because of Mexican mothers giving
birth to anchor
babies on the US side of the border (tell that to the US border towns
that have
gone bankrupt paying for Mexican stork service!); that young immigrants
are
more likely to be employed than US citizens (only because US citizens
are an older
part of the population and immigrants are younger); and that immigrants
are
less likely to be on the dole than US natives (a
bigger lie has never been
told!)
So
why did Jason L. Riley bother to write his Op-Ed? Primarily
to bitch and moan about the state
of immigration politics (he sees the chances that an amnesty bill will
pass Congress, this year, to be nothing short of abysmal) but also to
hurl a warning at the
general “diseased” state of our body politic. It
seems that all this talk about giveaways and fairness
and the
American dream and blah blah blah and so forth have spooked the US
Sheepeeple;
they appear to be in desperate need of firm guidance when it comes to
discussing
immigration (at the hands of the Wall
St. Journal, of course!).
The
first phase of immigration boosterism lasted a long time, starting in
1965 and
ending sometime around 2005, when the freshest border jumper or the
longest
visa overstayer queued up for his “illegal” right to receive a no-money
down,
food stamps mortgage. It was about that
time when the Sheepeeple began to get a strong whiff of a large rat in
the proverbial
kitchen of the nation. After 40 years
of the most outrageous lies, the politicians in Washington simply ran
out of
anyone prepared to listen to them. In
2006 amnesty breezed through the Republican Senate but died in raucous
committee hearings, which were held by Republican Representatives of
the House,
throughout the nation. That year, the
general public outcry killed the amnesty bill stone dead.
The next year, with a new Democrat Senate and
a new Democrat House, the amnesty bill suffered an ignoble filibuster,
going
down in flames as John McCain and Chuck Schumer were caught hiding
together in
the Senate cloakroom, eating rancid tuna fish sandwiches.
That
the generally dumb public is vehemently opposed to amnesty proves that
the
general public isn't so dumb! They do
not merely oppose amnesty for the 20 million + immigrants already in
the
country, they fondly desire that the yearly level of 2 million "legal"
immigrants be
drastically reduced! Members of the Wall
Street Journal Editorial Board will have much to bitch and moan
about in future. Reduction of the level of
legal immigration
is an idea that has come to ripen and is now ready to be intelligently
digested. Gone are the days when the sheep
had wool
over their eyes and looked at the world through coke-bottle glasses
fitted by the transnational media!
Dick Armey was seen yesterday attending a Tea Party rally in a hazmat suit.
DICK ARMEY : Always at the Head of His Troops!
Ben Nelson, who is running for reëlection to the US Senate (he just voted against Obamacare® after voting for it three months ago!) says that Amnesty doesn't have a prayer (like his reëlection chances!). He told the Grand Island Independent the other day that "There is doubt in my mind that comprehensive legislation [Amnesty for Illegals] may be a thing of the past, at least for the short-term future, because anything that is comprehensive is going to have to have a lot of moving parts, a lot of complexities to it, and what I found is that moving parts and complexities in legislation attract more opponents than proponents."
You said a mouthful, Ben! If Congress passes legislation, giving Amnesty to 20 million + Illegals, then said legislation will = (equal) unimaginable chaos on our southern border with Mexico. Jean Raspail could come out of retirement & write a sequel to The Camp of the Saints and make it to No. 1 on the New York Times Best-Seller List!
Democrats say the Tea Party Must be Stopped Before Its Members get Out of Hand ...
shop-worn and sounding worse. Her --- don't
say He/She/It! --- quips & quibbles quaint, that were so
pithy when Bill Clinton was taking envelopes from drug dealers &
getting blowjobs from cute pepper pot interns, took on a decidedly
caustic quality after her theretofore deft comedic techniques were used
to explain away the invasion of ramshackle Third World nations and the
kidnapping & torture of Muslim goat herders.Miss Coulter has recently run into a spot of bother up in Canada while on a speaking tour. Just before she left, she drew a deep breath and called the people who question the incredible neo-con version of what happened in DC & NYC on September 11, 2001 "kooks and crazies." The photo at right proves yet again that make-up has worked more miracles than Jesus!
Now if only eBay® took out the phrase extreme poverty and substituted the phrase extreme ignorance --- now that's something I could agree with and pay extra for (... in hopes of stopping extreme ignorance for good & all)!
I
was going to refrain from commenting about the latest so-called “Hate
Crime”
incident. But since it happened in New
Jersey and since yooz guys have bombarded me with e-mails about it, in
the
spirit of this website, that is to say, speaking the unspeakable, a
word or two
about it might be in order.
But
before I get along to the facts at hand, let me remind yooz guys that
the topic
has already been covered in these pages ---
notably on January 11, 2009 (Barry Just Loves You),
CLICK HERE
and scroll down.
On that day, the problems arising from “Hate Speech” prosecutions were
discussed in some detail. It was stated
therein that “Hate Speech” proceedings against a criminal Defendant are
always
whittled down to something else. “Hate Speech” is a prosecutorial blunt
instrument that is used to open a case rather than to close it. The frightened Defendant, begging for
prosecutorial
mercy, is supremely happy to cop to a lower offense just to get his
time on the
cross in the criminal “justice” system brought to an end.
The prosecutor is also happy --- because “Hate
Speech” statutes invariably clash with the First Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution. To my knowledge no state
“hate
speech” statute has ever been fully reviewed by the US Supreme Court.
In
Washington Township, in Bergen County, in New Jersey, a 16-year-old has
been
charged with bias, intimidation, and harassment (the cops mercifully
left
spitting-on-the-sidewalk out!) for
getting on the PA system in Wal-Mart and yelling “all Black people,
leave the
store now!” According to the 2000
census, Bergen County, NJ has a black population of less than 1%. So the Bergen cops, who arrested the young
prankster, were obviously trying to draw national publicity to
themselves, i.e.
they probably weren't pressured by any local Black group to make an
arrest in
this laughably insignificant case.
The
16-year-old faces a year in Juvie Hall, and if the Juvie judge decides
to throw
the book at him, which right at this moment, considering the national
publicity
that currently limelights this case, is a distinct possibility. Our 16-year-old prankster actually faces the
threat of real time in the lockup over his “Hate Speech” “crime”
because in
most states of the Union the general practice of juvenile justice often
precludes consultation with the U.S. Constitution.
In brief, an adult prankster pulling the same
gag on the same day in the same Wal-Mart would have been treated much
more
gingerly by the cops for the simple reason that his court-appointed
lawyer
would have most likely advised him that “Hate speech” charges have
never been fully
tested in all aspects of legality. But now that Barry is in the White
House,
the NAACP can always hope they get the kind of CHANGE they can believe
in!
Sen. Russell pleaded with the other members of the Commission to omit this laughable conclusion of Specter's from the Commission's final report, due to be published in days. Sen Russell had hoped that even if he failed to get the "magic bullet" excluded from the Commission report, he could at least lodge his objections into the permanent, running transcript of the Commission's proceedings. But he would be thwarted completely in this design : J. Lee Rankin, Chief Counsel of the Warren Commission, ordered that the entire transcript of what Sen. Russell had said on Sept. 18, 1964, behind closed doors, destroyed. Four years later, Russell was cued into what Rankin had done. Unlike Kennedy's brain, which had disappeared without a trace from the National Archives in DC, the transcript of the Commission's Sept. 18, 1964 proceedings had never been logged in!
On January 16, 2004 a letter sign by Attorney General John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, & CIA Director George Tenet was sent to every member of the 911 Commission. The letter dealt with many things, most notable was its denial of the Commissioners' request that the "planners" of the 911 bombings in DC & NYC be questioned about their operational roles in the murderous events under investigation.
Ashcroft, Rumsfeld, & Tenet proffered the standard excuse of national security but what they omitted to say was that the "planners" had been tortured in order to secure their confessions of involvement in the 911 bombings. In New York on Sept. 11th, the North & South Towers of the World Trade Center, along with Building No. 7 in the same wide complex, not having been hit by a plane, all seemed to rapidly collapse in utter defiance of Newtonian Physics; they appeared to explode rather than crumple slowly, or gradually buck and bend, as tall trussed, steel-framed structures invariably do when their scientifically constructed frameworks come under sudden stress. The fact that the "planners" had been tortured to "volunteer" information about the 911 attacks would have again revived the suspicion of many architects and engineers, not in the pay of the federal government, that the WTC North & South Towers, and particularly Building No. 7, had been "pulled" --- i. e., brought down through means of controlled demolition.
To see a [slow-loading] pdf of the Jan. 16, 2004 of the letter herein mentioned, CLICK HERE. The letter is at page 26 of the pdf.
Peter Schiff: I think it is going to be pretty bad and whether it starts in '07 or '08, I think is immaterial and I also think it is going to last not just for quarters but for years. See the basic problem with the US economy is we have too much consumption and borrowing and not enough production and savings. And what's going to happen is the American consumer is going to basically stop consuming and start rebuilding his savings, especially when he sees his home equity evaporate.
And when you have the economy 70% consumption, you can't address those imbalances without a recession.
You know, rather than the recession being resisted, it should really be embraced because the disease is really this debt financed consumption. The cure is that we stop consuming and start saving and producing again and that's a recession. And sometimes medicine tastes bad but you got to swallow it.
Reporter: Alright Laffer you hear him, he says that the consumer is going to slow down in order to rebuild the savings. And you know that two-thirds of the American economy is driven by the American consumer. Do you believe that?
Art Laffer: No I don't believe any of it. Whatsoever. Excuse me Michelle. What he's saying is that savings is way down in this country but wealth has risen dramatically.
The United States economy has never been in better shape. There is no tax increase coming in the next couple of years. Monetary policy is spectacular. We have freer trade than ever before. And not only that, there are no incomes policy. I think Peter is just totally off base and I don't think it's going to be, I mean, I just don't know where he's getting his stuff.
Peter Schiff: One of us is off base and it is definitely not me. I mean it is not wealth that has increased in the last few years, we haven't increased our productive capacity. All that has increased is the paper values of our stocks and real estate but that's not real wealth no more than the Nasqaq was wealth. If you see the stock market come down and the real estate bubble burst all that phony wealth is going to evaporate and all that is going to be left is all the debt we accumulated to foreigners.
Art Laffer: Peter, I am going to make a bet with you on this one. I bet you a penny on this one that if you sign a letter if you are wrong you will sign a letter that you were wrong to me. You are way off base, there is nothing that tells us, we are going to have a nice slow down but it's not going to be a crash.
Reporter: Let me ask you this, there's a lot of folks out there point to the housing market and they say that a huge percentage of jobs created, some argue 30% of the job creation over the past few years has been because of the housing boom -- whether it is construction or mortgage brokers, real estate brokers, etc. And if all that goes away, what happens with all those jobs.
Art Laffer: There will be lots of things to fill it back up again, Michelle.
Reporter: Such as?
Art Laffer: You know the neat thing about this economy is we have a lot of flexibility in what we produce in what we have in the wealth and housing has filled a huge gap coming here. And other things will fill in that gap. It really is not a housing economy, this is an economy that is driven by good economic policies, by good monetary policy, by good trade policy, and it's working beautifully.
Peter Schiff: I suppose it's good if you're an investor in gold and oil or other foreign assets but it's certainly not good from the point of view of the United States. And you know from the real estate, it is not just the wealth effect or the jobs that come directly from real estate but because we've had such artificially low interest rates which are quickly going to become a thing of the past, a lot of Americans are going to ... [interrupted]
Reporter: Well I don't know about that, you know Peter, the ten year yield is still ... The Fed keeps going and going and going here ...
Peter: What I'm talking about, a lot of people have adjustable rate mortgages that are going to reset over the next couple of years and people are going to see their mortgage payments go up by 50% and 100% and a lot of that is going to take a lot of spending away from the economy. Because people are going to spend whatever money they have on interest payments.
Art Laffer: Come on Peter, it's a zero sum game. Every interest dollar paid is an interest dollar earned.
Peter Schiff: People that earn the dollars are in China and in Japan and in Europe -- they are not in America anymore. We don't owe it to ourselves, we owe it abroad.
Art Laffer: Oh my goodness! I have never heard so many mistakes made in series in my life Peter.
Peter Schiff: Then you ought to listen to your own clip!
Art Laffer: Well I do a lot and you know, what can I tell you Peter. It's a bet of a penny in your honor that is at stake -- and mine too.
Reporter: When you talk about selling to China and India etc, what is wrong with that if we are selling products, if they are buying products around the world. That lifts the entire global economy.
Peter schiff: The problem is we are not selling them products, they are making products and sending them here. [Interrupted]
Art Laffer: They are not holding dollars as a favor to us. [Paraphrase]
Peter Schiff: We are running up 60 billion dollar a month trade deficit, that means that the world is providing us with 60 billion dollars more of goods and services that we can afford to pay for.
Art Laffer: No, no, listen Peter for one second. They are holding deposits in the US not as a favor to us, because they like holding it there. We are outsourcing our monetary policy to China and to a lot of the rest of the world.. they are paying us huge senior-age gain for the act of providing them a banking system and monetary policy. It's called seniorage gain, GOSH!
Peter Schiff: All we are providing them with is inflation and they are accumulating assets while we are accumulating liabilities. We've got to service this debt. We've got to pay interest on this. We are not borrowing to produce.
Art Laffer: We ran a trade deficit from 1640 to 1870, 230 years of trade deficits.
Peter Schiff: You are missing the most important aspect. Back then we borrowed to build factories to build infrastructure. We were borrowing to produce. Now we are borrowing to remodel our kitchens, to buy big screen TVs, and to take vacations.
Art Laffer: All these years that we've been running these trade deficits, the wealth of the average American household has been going up, not down.
Peter Schiff: The average American is going deeper and deeper into debt, he's struggling to get by. And all that happens is some appraiser tries to say that your house is worth all this money. This is an illusion. Look at all these for sale signs.
Reporter: What measure are you using?
Art Laffer: I am using the household survey from the Federal Reserve Board which shows American household's net wealth. You know, he's using a savings rate measure from the National Income Accounts which is totally inappropriate for the purpose that he is doing it. And I don't know how to respond when I don't know the numbers.
Peter Schiff: Why do a husband and wife both have to work to provide enough income to support a family.
Art Laffer: With low income tax rates, they like working.
Peter Schiff: You kidding? Most women with children are not working because they love it, they are working because they need the income. They can't afford it.
Art Laffer: With lower tax rates, it makes it more valuable to work. And lower interest rates, you can buy more. It is great.
Reporter: I don't know Peter, are you suggesting most women would stay home.
Peter Schiff: A lot of women, I see women seven months pregnant sometimes when I'm out waiting tables. They don't want to be there. They need to be there because their husband does not make enough after he finishes paying taxes to support the family. But what we need to do in America is get back to the business of saving again and producing again. We can't just keep accumulating debt. We can't put this national consumption on a credit card and assume that because the crisis has not happened yet that it's never going to happen.
Reporter: Peter, I would argue that a lot of women like to work. I think a lot of women enjoy their job and they enjoy the privilege that men had for a very long time -- which is to get out of the house and be productive in many ways not just in raising children.
Art Laffer: Hear Hear Michelle.
Reporter: Gentlemen, you know, I barely participated. I enjoyed that quite a lot just listening to you both go at it. So we are going to have to get you back again. Art Laffer and Peter Schiff in on whether or not we are going to see a recession.
Peter Schiff: I want to collect that penny.
Art Laffer: I'll collect it with a nice note from you Peter.
Peter Schiff: And all the dollar is going to be worth is a penny!
Wait till Barry hears about this ...
(HOT DAMN ON TOAST !!!)
Hey, Where's Your Manners! Don't Talk to Barbie® That Way!
Well, the Republican Congress is gone & George W. Bush is gone & the "counterfeit-proof" Drivers' License is gone or so it seems --- but wait there's more!
According to the Wall Street Journal, Sen. Charles "Chuck" Schumer & Sen. Lindsey "Light in the Loafers" Graham (who said Peter Pan doesn't vote the straight Republican ticket!) have hatched a new scheme to bring the "counterfeit-proof" Drivers' License back! These two worthies have had a true brainstorm, the likes of which are much like the last Congressional brainstorm, only worse! Trust our dubiously elected officials to resurrect decrepit, bad ideas which have long gone on the mold!
There is one, whopping, great, big, major hitch --- though. It seems local cops only "proof" people who can speak English (stopping Illegal Aliens on the street & asking them for identification would be "Racist"); and potential employers don't ask foreigners for identification because what shifty bosses really want is peon labor at coolie prices. Despite the cold facts of hard reality, the "counterfeit-proof" Drivers' License should work just fine! Thanks, Chuck. Thanks, Loafers. What a couple of frickin' political geniuses!
When George W. Bush was elected in 2000 (some would say "selected"), a dollar was worth a $1.00. When Barry Spendalicious blew into DC 8 yrs. later, a dollar was worth a hefty 75¢, thanks to inflation & Alan Greenspan ( some would say "Greenscam").
Attempts to put GW's portrait on the double saw-buck failed years back when several cashiers at various Mickey Dees, across the land, refused to accept the new currency because they feared it might be a "true" counterfeit :
A “Tea
Partier” writes to express his dismay over the “appalling” fact that
the tea
party movement has yet to address the US Immigration problem in its
various
planks. He tells me that the “TEA”
in
Tea Party stands for “Taxed Enough Already” --- the first that I have
ever heard
of this acronym (who said you don’t learn something new every day!).
But
when all is said and done, one can't really blame the Tea Party
Organizers for
trying to avoid a potential problem : long
ago the minions of the transnational media got into the habit of
calling anyone
who objects to the current deluge of Third World Immigration into the
US a “Racist,”
plain and simple. So being called
out,
so to speak, is just one extra problem that the Tea Party organizers
need like a
ten-penny nail to the forehead!
But
the “Taxed Enough Already” people may just find themselves being called
Racists
sooner than they think. Using the
U.S.
Census as an uncertain guide, the number of Third Worlders or
non-Whites in the
country presently hovers somewhere between 35% & 40%.
This exploding segment of our population is,
for the most part, of the tax-eater rather than the tax-payer class. As this segment of the population continues
to grow, as it is destined to do under the automatic triggers of the
Immigration
Act of 1965, the clash over the limited pot of our national system of
free Goodies
& big Bennies threatens to turn quite ugly.
If
the Red Chinese are right when they say that there is not enough money
in the
world to sustain the current level of American borrowing based on the
diarrhea-like
issuance of US Treasury bonds, then there are not enough White
tax-payers to pay
for the demands of non-White tax-eaters visited upon the nation's
bounty, i.e.
the amount of filthy lucre that Whitey is expected to stump up in order
to avoid
being called a “Racist.”
It
has been observed, not for the first time and nor will it be for the
last, that
diverse or mixed nations find that their roiling racial makeups are
invariably incompatible
in the conduct of reasoned debate. Where
once there would have been a clash between the have-nots and the haves
or arguments
based on shadings of ideology, now every issue, including financial
ones, are
automatically reduced to the gutter level of cross-racial accusations. Whites can move out of neighborhoods that are
“changing,” but though they retreat to the sea walls of the Pacific and
Atlantic, they cannot escape being called “Racist” for wanting to run
from a
high tax bill, for such flight proves that they are eminently guilty of
shirking “societal responsibility.”
prirent une grande quantité de poissons dans leurs filets." ( Luc 5 ).
But in the fever-dream of insanity that has gripped the British Isles since the Labour Party was first elected to run Her Majesty's Government in 1997, a choleric phobia has been visited upon all and sundry, regarding the real or imagined disease of "Racism."
A shopkeeper in the Scottish city of Aberdeen has been visited by representatives of the local constabulary. It seems that he has been caught red-handed for engaging in the offense of promoting Racism in public. It also seems that the shopkeeper had dressed up a store dummy with a T-Shirt, bearing the slogan, in capital letters, of ANYONE BUT ENGLAND. It further seems that considering ... now follow this brand of twisted logic closely or you may wind up completely confused ... Scotland is inhabited by the descendants of Picts, Gaels, & Celts, therefore saying or showing such a baldly insulting statement in public, like for instance, ANYONE BUT ENGLAND, could possibly hurt the feelings of some of the many Englanders presently residing in Scotland, who are descended, for the most part, from Anglo-Saxons & Normans! --- "Hate Speech" being strictly verboten in the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.
Perhaps it was seeing the store dummy in the shop window that set the police off. To see one of your own, a perfectly innocent dummy, being put to such rank use, might have given these particular Scottish guardians of the civil peace cause to object! (By the way, can one say Scottish anymore without getting arrested? Is the current and correct PC Term, Scots? Is using the old adjective of Scottish now Racist?).
A
Clubber posits : “we can agree that Global Warming and Open Borders are
both
religious propositions rather than soundly reasoned political positions. So now that global warming has been exposed
as a false religion, shouldn't Open Borders follow right behind and
jump into
the dustbin of history?”
Great
question and one that should be asked! --- but Open Borders and
the lies that
surround it can’t be deconstructed in the same way in which Global
Warming was
exposed by showing that the props surrounding climate-thinking were
woven from whole cloth
: the people who ran the global warming
scam simply cooked the books, as it were. When
the “facts” backing their assertions were audited,
the assertions
were exposed for the pathetic absurdities that they ultimately were. Just you wait --- Open Borders will prove to
be a much harder nut to crack.
Open
borders is a secular religion that depends upon a tight rule of manners
to keep
it going. The rich and connected
people
who believe in it don't live in the inner cities or the clapboard
suburbs where
the newly-arrived Third Worlders live. To
them, immigrants are abstract personages they see only
on TeeVee, not
people of flesh & blood, whom they experience in a day-in, day-out
way. The rich & connected don't drive
on roads
choked with “Trench Town” taxis, nor do their children go to school
with Aztecs
who are even illiterate in Spanish. Believers
in Open Borders are completely cocooned from
reality. Theirs is a world of fantasy, in
which border
jumpers become physicists and visa overstayers win spelling bees. Believers in Open Borders haven't even
bothered
to concoct a pathetic hoax as a jumping-off point from which to
perpetrate
lies. The mythical religion that they
have constructed is built on the most paper-thin of dreams. That the Immigration Act of 1965 has rendered
this country into a waking nightmare is a cold reality which is of
little
moment to our rich & connected Golden Pony Boys, who ride the white
charger
of pure and blissful political science fiction into the mists of creamy
logic. When all is said and done, and all
evidence is going to
the contrary, it
is what they see on TeeVee, which are ultimately fantasies of their own
devising, that will ever carry the day. Because
on TeeVee it is Whitey-White White who is always
Bad and the
Lesser Shade of Pale who is always Good. You
cannot argue the facts with a shadow nor can you
disprove a Tall-Tale
that walks on stilts. And if you have
the audacity to kick the stilts away and send a false proposition into
the
proverbial mud where it belongs, you will only be accused of “hate
speech” and
someday, if the election results keep going the way they have been
recently, you'll
be charged with the “hate crime” of hurting somebody's feelings.
In
the playground and in the sandbox of current debate, adults are most
definitely
not welcome --- simply because hopscotch and pink plastic shovels look
ridiculous at their feet and in the hands. Open
Borders is not simply a hoax or simply a religion :
it is pure juvenilia
in debate and baby-talk in reasoning. The
training wheels are always on and never come off! When
the topic of Immigration is brought up,
the left-wing response will always be “RACIST;” and then you know it's
time for
teacher to call for a nap or ring a bell for sugar cookie break! Being eternally 6 means never having to
think with your head.
And
just because global warming has been exposed as an outrageous hoax,
doesn't
mean that the hoaxers are still not waiting in the weeds, looking for
the
first
chance to jump out and run their scam all over again when the time
seems
right. Afterall, Daddy, the ice cap
is still
melting and the polar bears are still drowning! You
wouldn't want to be mean, now would you? --- Daddy?
greatly
reduced the wholesale loss of
American life on that horrid day in New York. But alas, it was not to
be --- we know now that mass murder, not mass vandalism, was the
primary objective on that day; and we know now that the cut-outs from
Saudi Arabia were under the direction of an "ex"
CIA asset, who had crazily hoped to suck the US military into unending
wars of occupation in the Middle East (MISSION
ACCOMPLISHED!).Since 1965, the Statue of Liberty has been the paramount symbol of the Open Borders crowd of the transnational mind-shapers. The tall, inanimate structure, covered in verdigris, has become the shining emblem of our mindless Immigration policy to the Third World (2 million legals; 1 million illegals : per annum). We are incessantly taught that to control and reduce this massive influx is to somehow spit on the sacred graves of our grandfathers, who passed through Ellis Island and went straight to work, without benefit of a handout or free room and board!
The success of the propaganda campaign, surrounding the Statue of Liberty, is a disgusting testament to the failed Immigration policy of this country, such as it is. But it has not always been thus. The Statue was constructed in France and put on an American pedestal in vastly different circumstances in 1886, on Bedloe's Island in Upper New York Bay; and after the brass bands packed their tents, it was put to immediate use as a working lighthouse. A short, excellent piece about the history and significance of the Statue of Liberty was written for vdare.com, just three months before the unhappy and cursed events of 911. It bears reading ... (CLICK HERE).
The Internationale. [variant words in square brackets]
Arise ye workers [starvelings] from your slumbers
Arise ye prisoners of want
For reason in revolt now thunders
And at last ends the age of cant.
Away with all your superstitions
Servile masses arise, arise!
We'll change henceforth [forthwith] the old tradition [conditions]
And spurn the dust to win the prize!
So comrades, come rally
And the last fight let us face,
The Internationale unites the human race!
So comrades, come rally
And the last fight let us face,
The Internationale unites the human race!
No more deluded by reaction
On tyrants only we'll make war
The soldiers too will take strike action
They'll break ranks and fight no more
And if those cannibals keep trying
To sacrifice us to their pride
They soon shall hear the bullets flying ---
We'll shoot the generals on our own side!
No Saviour from on high delivers
No faith have we in Prince or Peer
Our own right hand the chains must shiver
Chains of hatred, greed and fear
E'er the thieves will out with their booty [give up their booty]
And give to all a happier lot.
Each [those] at the forge must do their duty
And we'll strike while the iron is hot!
Direction
&
no-name Katrina appeared to have been established by NYS Sen.
Malcolm Smith (on left) and Congressman Gregory Meeks (on right), two
"minority" politicos who, for years, have been considered nothing more
than low-level street hustlers, ever on the lookout for No.10 envelopes
stuffed with cash (some local reporters, with whom I have talked, have
told me that there is even an informal betting-poll set up by the local
press regarding Smith & Meeks --- the winner gets to trouser
the kitty on the day Smith & Meeks walk out of federal court on a
"daisy chain").Even a one-time Queens County Assistant District Attorney, Claude Stuart, who was infamous for fixing prosecution cases and who was finally fired and lost his law license for three years for sending hapless criminal Defendants up the river on "cooked" evidence, is said to be have also been observed dipping into the public till via these bogus charities. The New York Times has devoted column inches to these shenanigans : for the latest, CLICK HERE.
The
trials and tribulations of the nation of Greece, and of that country's
enormous
difficulties in maintaining debt service on $300 billion in outstanding
government
bonds, was much in the news last week. It
would
appear (although appearances, at the moment, are
most likely
deceptive) that Germany will stand “good” for maintaining Greece’s debt
service, but the details of this generous backstopping, on the part of
Germany, have yet to be worked out and the assent of the German
electorate has still not been
smoothed over!
It
has been said many times over, throughout history, that Fiat currencies
are
doomed. A paper collapse is bound to
happen sooner or later. (Remember
when
JZ made a music video, two or three years ago, in which he threw stacks
of
Euros at the camera and boasted of his great wealth?).
Well, the Euro is no longer such a hot
commodity now that Greek politicians have begrimed and begreased that
now
declining currency.
John
Maynard Keynes considered gold to be a barbarous affectation of
hidebound
bankers, who were much too conservative for the good of the
Commonwealth. Despite the fact that
you no longer see the
word “conservative” with the word “bankers” in the same sentence
anymore, gold
may be a barbarous affectation but it was and has always been and will
always
remain an affectation which can undergird any stable national monetary
system. If the power to tax is the power
to destroy, then the power to print baseless paper money, not based on
copper,
not based on silver, not based on gold, not based on anything
whatsoever, means
that when a central bank perpetrates the crime of the printing press,
even
if it be deemed legal by the home government, it amounts to nothing,
more nor less, than
the legitimatization of a Ponzi scheme on a national scale.
And
after the Ponzi scheme collapses, governments are likely to institute
strict
currency controls, making the trading of the afflicted national
currency a
crime across international borders. So
far
Greece has not reached that point, yet. But
will the Germans really stand “good” for maintaining
the debt
service on Greece's $300 billion outstanding debt --- what about
future
outstanding debt? The Germans are
determined to keep the Euro going and may
be willing to
backstop Greece through February and March, but what happens if Ireland
or
Spain or Portugal or even Italy
wind up facing sovereign debt shortfalls right along
with Greece at sometime in the near future? April
is
the month for Spring cleaning. Come
April, German non-conservative bankers and German non-conservative
voters may be looking to buy a big broom in order to chase the Euro
PIIGS out of the Euro
house. Say what??? --- Good
riddance to bad rubbish or so goeth the way of all flesh and of all
paper-fiat currency!
The
English politician, William Hague, was the distinguished leader of Her
Majesty's Opposition during the period of 1997 through 2001. He was, what the
English call, the Shadow Prime Minister. But
he
didn't lead much of a political opposition. After
being
decimated in the 1997 General Election, the
Conservatives chose him strictly on the basis of his speaking abilities. He was at his most eloquent when he
characterized the Prime Minister of the time, Tony Blair, as a man of
“U-turns,
errors and sellouts!”
The
UK economy was booming in 2001 & the real effects of Third World
immigration had only just started to become apparent;
Hague resolved to chance a mention or two
about the consequences of Labour's Immigration policies : in March of
that
year, he kicked off the General Election campaign by proclaiming ---
“We will
give you your country back!” The
Conservatives gained only one seat in the country-wide poll and
remained, for
another 4 years, in the political wilderness; in 2005, Labour, with
only
35% of the vote, was again reëlected with a reduced majority, but
were, by then,
exposed for the charlatans and crooks that they, preeminently, had
always been.
Hague
resigned in 2001 as the Conservative leader but stayed on in parliament
as an
MP. He has been much touted to make
a comeback,
either as UK Secretary of State or Deputy Prime Minister, if David
Cameron wins
the General Election in the Spring. But
William Hague has long since learned to bottle up his eloquence. The Daily
Telegraph says that he will not be
making any speeches regarding Tory intentions on immigration policy
(“[Hague
rules] out using immigration as a weapon in the election campaign.”).
Nine
years
on, one would think that the British people have had more than
enough of
13 years of massive Third World immigration, thanks to Labour. But the Tories seem to have a knack
for
throwing elections in the most cavalier ways imaginable.
Right now they are fading fast in the polls,
so much so that if the General Election were held today, they would be
unable
to form an absolute majority in the House of Commons.
The “limey” conservatives appear to be
not very different from the “yankee” ones. Both
seem
to have an inbred, absolute abhorrence when it
comes to making
a political issue of the vicissitudes of Third World Immigration. Like Pavlov's dogs, they have been well and
truly trained by their master, the transnational Press : it is easy to
translate the sound of the old, hoarse bark for what it is, into
yelping English --- “THAT’S
RACIST!” --- says the BOW WOW.
veil,
an
article of clothing that covers the entirety of the visage, which
conceals even the eyes that are obliged to peep out at the world
through two openings made of tightly woven mosquito-netting).On this occasion, after "unmasking" his soon-to-be wife, the male party-in-question discovered that his betrothed was sporting a full beard as well as a decided squint! The man might have be able to live with a beard on a woman, but according to his many protests of disgust, a pronounced squint in a woman was something that he could not abide over the span of a lifetime.
According to Press Reports, the marriage contract was soon voided on the legal grounds of Deception--- ipso facto --- grossly committed by the bearded woman, who was probably squinting when she signed the Islamic document in question. (The bold Yemeni woman, on the left, was photographed wearing a niqāb sans mosquito-netting. Women who wear a niqāb, having eye-holes made of mosquito-netting, are exceedingly shy and simply refuse to turn towards the camera!).
A
Abbie
(North America) a Jewish male. From the proper name Abraham. Originated before the 1950s.
ABCD
(South Asians in the U.S.) "American-Born Confused Desi", a term used to refer to Indian Americans and Pakistani Americans born in the United States. The condescending term is used chiefly by South Asian Immigrants to imply confusion about cultural identity.
Abo / Abbo
(AUS) Australian Aboriginal person. Originally, this was simply an informal term for "Aborigine", and was in fact used by Aboriginal people themselves until it started to be considered offensive in 1950s. In remoter areas, Aboriginal people still often refer to themselves (quite neutrally) as "Blackfellas" (and whites as "Whitefellas"). Although "Abo" is still considered quite offensive by many, the pejorative "boong" is now more commonly used when the intent is to deliberately offend, as that word's status as an insult is unequivocal.
Albino
(U.S.) A term for whites, also a derogatory term for light skinned blacks used by darker skinned blacks. (see colorism)
Alligator bait
(U.S.) also "Gator Bait." A black person, especially a black child. More commonly used in states where alligators are found, particularly Florida. First used in the early 1900s, although some hypothesize the term originated in the late 1800s.
Alter kacker / alter kocker (Yiddish) / alter kucker / A.K.
(North America) a disparaging term for elderly Jewish people. The term is of Yiddish origin (literally meaning old shitter). First used in the early 1900s.
Anglo-pilferer
An Anglo-Celtic Australian, possibly of convict lineage. Based on the belief that all Anglo-Australians are descended from convicts. Particularly offensive.
Ann
(North America) A white woman to a black person — or a black woman who acts too much like a white one. While Miss Ann, also just plain Ann, is a derisive reference to the white woman, by extension it is applied to any black woman who puts on airs and tries to act like Miss Ann.
Ape
(U.S.) a black person.
Apple
(North America) An American Indian (Native American) who is "red on the outside, white on the inside." Used primarily by other American Indians to indicate someone who has lost touch with their cultural identity. First used in the 1980s.
Argie
(UK) a native of Argentina (also Argie-bargie : any argument, disagreement, or (typically) sporting event involving Argentina or Argentinians), used by the British press during the Falklands War. First used in this way by Britain's The Sun newspaper in 1982. --- This was however merely a topical usage of a long-standing expression for contentious discussion.
Asian nigger
An ethnic slur against Filipinos.
Aunt Jemima / Aunt Jane / Aunt Mary / Aunt Sally / Aunt Thomasina
(U.S.) a black woman who "kisses up" to whites, a "sellout", female counterpart of Uncle Tom.
B
Banana
(North America) An Asian American who is "yellow on the outside, white on the inside." Used primarily by Asians and other Asian Americans to indicate someone who has lost touch with their cultural identity.
... And so it goes.
Well, Barry Spendalicious wants to call a "private" meeting against the Republicans on TeeVee ( the Republicans will be in the room but Barry will do all the talking! ) about bi-partisan HealthCare® "reform," because he knows that, like Wrongway McCain, the congressional pachyderms don't possess a single idea among themselves on the issue.
My advice? --- offer to double or treble the Medicaid ceiling so that this Great Society program will cover many more indigent citizens; and while the DC crumb bums are at it, go ahead and assume the entire Medicaid burden of the states, an act of legerdemain which that hopeless Airhead from Calli-fore-knee-uh would just love! But, oh, we'll have to clear it with the Chinese first. After buying almost 600 billion $s in Fannie & Freddie paper once upon a time, guaranteed by Hank Paulson, the Commies might not cotton to the prospect of Medicaid bonds guaranteed by Timmy Geithner!
There
will be a party primary taking place this summer in Arizona for John
McCain's US
Senate seat. JD Hayworth, the challenger, has already started making
Robo calls to Republican
voters in which he calls McCain a “moderate” and characterizes his
positions on bank regulation and immigration as “moderate.” “Moderate” is the new Liberal.
It is the new dirty word in US politics.
Byron
Dorgan,
the retiring senator from North Dakota, is a Democrat and a
self-avowed moderate. His colleague in
the Senate, Dem. Kent Conrad, is another self-avowed moderate. Rob Port, a political commentator on North
Dakota radio, says : “The joke here
is that we elect conservatives to state
office because we don't want them to spend our money, but we elect
liberals to
national office because we want them to spend other people's money!”
Teddy
Kennedy
blew into DC, in late
1962, on the wings of a Special Election. It would take a visit from
the Grim Reaper, last year, to prise his ample butt from that
idiosyncratic chair made of expansive Massachusetts oak. In a new book
about ex-US Senator John Edwards ( The
Politician by Andrew Young ), Teddy waxes eloquent about the
paradisaical atmosphere of the nation's capital in the early 60s : “It used to be civilized.
The media was on our side. We'd get our work done by one o'clock and by
two we were at the White House chasing women. We got the job done, and
the reporters focused on the issues. . . . It was civilized.”
premiership
also
underwent
a transformation. In the 30 years since then-Prime
Minister Harold Macmillan had stated that now Britain would henceforth
play the British Athens to the American Rome, Tony Blair decided to
supply the American Rome with 40,000 British centurions, all for the
better to invade Iraq with. We know the rest of the story.
Although George W. Bush managed to obtain a second term with the help
of a rigged electronic voting machines in Ohio and ceaseless, numbing
propaganda in transnational press, Tony Blair's political career ended
for good and all in the sands of Mesopotamia. Even though he
managed to eke out a remarkable majority, under the circumstances, in
the Commons for Labour in the 2005 General Election ( Labour : 35%;
Conservative : 32%; Liberal : 22%; UKIP : 2%; Other Parties : 9% ), the
Blair Watch became a political Death Watch, but prevaricating Tony
managed to hang on for another two years until handing the reins of
government over to Gordon Brown, an incoherent
bumbler who would makes
Blair, in retrospect, look like a Demosthenes.Yesterday Tony Blair faced a parliamentary committee that is delving into the reasons behind the British Army's transformation into a stooge and poodle for the American War Machine in 2003. Said Tony : “I genuinely believe that if we had left Saddam in power, even with what we know now, we would still have to deal with him in circumstances when the threat was worse and possibly when it was hard to mobilize any support for dealing with the threat.”
Untruthful Tony dodged and weaved and faked. The words tumbled from his mouth effortlessly, no matter how outrageously false. Without evidence that Saddam Hussein was a threat to anybody but himself, the British military had followed blindly, and with absolute obedience, the American lead. About this disgraceful state of affairs for England, Blair seems not to have the lightest regret nor the slightest pang of conscience. As with most criminals, it seems, his only regret is getting tangled up in fabrications and exposed for lies. But his suit stayed pressed and his false smile remained, true to form, concrete and shockingly insincere.
You Can Still Crawl Over to Our Old Page by CLICKING HERE.